Ground Beef Yellow Grease Vs Clear Grease Vitamin a

A review of fatty acrid profiles and antioxidant content in grass-fed and grain-fed beef

Cynthia A Daley

¹College of Agriculture, California Country University, Chico, CA, United states of america

Amber Abbott

¹College of Agriculture, California Land Academy, Chico, CA, Us

Patrick S Doyle

¹College of Agriculture, California State University, Chico, CA, USA

Glenn A Nader

ⁱⁱUniversity of California Cooperative Extension Service, Davis, CA, The states

Stephanie Larson

²University of California Cooperative Extension Service, Davis, CA, Us

Received 2009 Jul 29; Accepted 2010 Mar ten.

Abstruse

Growing consumer interest in grass-fed beefiness products has raised a number of questions with regard to the perceived differences in nutritional quality between grass-fed and grain-fed cattle. Inquiry spanning iii decades suggests that grass-based diets can significantly ameliorate the fatty acid (FA) composition and antioxidant content of beefiness, admitting with variable impacts on overall palatability. Grass-based diets have been shown to raise total conjugated linoleic acid (CLA) (C18:2) isomers, trans vaccenic acid (TVA) (C18:i t11), a precursor to CLA, and omega-three (n-3) FAs on a m/g fatty basis. While the overall concentration of total SFAs is not unlike betwixt feeding regimens, grass-finished beef tends toward a college proportion of cholesterol neutral stearic FA (C18:0), and less cholesterol-elevating SFAs such as myristic (C14:0) and palmitic (C16:0) FAs. Several studies suggest that grass-based diets elevate precursors for Vitamin A and E, as well as cancer fighting antioxidants such equally glutathione (GT) and superoxide dismutase (SOD) activity as compared to grain-fed contemporaries. Fat conscious consumers will also prefer the overall lower fat content of a grass-fed beef product. Nonetheless, consumers should be aware that the differences in FA content volition likewise give grass-fed beef a distinct grass flavor and unique cooking qualities that should exist considered when making the transition from grain-fed beef. In addition, the fat from grass-finished beefiness may accept a yellowish appearance from the elevated carotenoid content (precursor to Vitamin A). It is also noted that grain-fed beef consumers may attain like intakes of both n-3 and CLA through the consumption of college fat grain-fed portions.

Review Contents

i. Introduction

2. Fatty acid contour in grass-fed beef

iii. Touch on of grass-finishing on omega-three fatty acids

4. Impact of grass-finishing on conjugated linoleic acid (CLA) and trans-vaccenic acid (TVA)

5. Impact of grass-finishing on β-carotenes/carotenoids

half dozen. Bear upon of grass-finishing on α-tocopherol

seven. Impact of grass-finishing on GT & SOD activity

8. Impact of grass-finishing on flavor and palatability

9. Decision

10. References

Introduction

At that place is considerable back up amid the nutritional communities for the nutrition-centre (lipid) hypothesis, the thought that an imbalance of dietary cholesterol and fats are the primary cause of atherosclerosis and cardiovascular disease (CVD) [1]. Health professionals globe-wide recommend a reduction in the overall consumption of SFAs, trans-fatty acids (TAs) and cholesterol, while emphasizing the need to increase intake of north-3 polyunsaturated fats [1,two]. Such broad sweeping nutritional recommendations with regard to fatty consumption are largely due to epidemiologic studies showing potent positive correlations between intake of SFA and the incidence of CVD, a condition believed to outcome from the concomitant rise in serum low-density-lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol as SFA intake increases [3,4]. For example, it is generally accepted that for every 1% increment in energy from SFA, LDL cholesterol levels reportedly increase past ane.3 to 1.seven mg/dL (0.034 to 0.044 mmol/L) [5-seven].

Wide promotion of this correlative data spurred an anti-SFA campaign that reduced consumption of dietary fats, including nearly animal proteins such as meat, dairy products and eggs over the concluding 3 decades [eight], indicted on their relatively high SFA and cholesterol content. Withal, more recent lipid inquiry would advise that not all SFAs take the aforementioned bear upon on serum cholesterol. For instance, lauric acid (C12:0) and myristic acid (C14:0), accept a greater total cholesterol raising effect than palmitic acid (C16:0), whereas stearic acid (C18:0) has a neutral effect on the concentration of total serum cholesterol, including no credible impact on either LDL or HDL. Lauric acid increases total serum cholesterol, although information technology also decreases the ratio of total cholesterol:HDL because of a preferential increment in HDL cholesterol [5,seven,9]. Thus, the individual fatty acid profiles tend to be more than instructive than broad lipid classifications with respect to subsequent impacts on serum cholesterol, and should therefore be considered when making dietary recommendations for the prevention of CVD.

Clearly the lipid hypothesis has had broad sweeping impacts; not simply on the way nosotros eat, just also on the manner nutrient is produced on-subcontract. Indeed, changes in animal breeding and genetics accept resulted in an overall leaner beef production[10]. Preliminary examination of diets containing today's leaner beef has shown a reduction in serum cholesterol, provided that beef consumption is limited to a three ounce portion devoid of all external fat [11]. O'Dea's work was the first of several studies to show today's leaner beefiness products can reduce plasma LDL concentrations in both normal and hyper-cholesterolemic subjects, theoretically reducing risk of CVD [12-15].

Across changes in genetics, some producers have also altered their feeding practices whereby reducing or eliminating grain from the ruminant nutrition, producing a production referred to as "grass-fed" or "grass-finished". Historically, most of the beef produced until the 1940's was from cattle finished on grass. During the 1950'due south, considerable research was done to better the efficiency of beefiness production, giving birth to the feedlot industry where high free energy grains are fed to cattle equally means to decrease days on feed and ameliorate marbling (intramuscular fatty: International monetary fund). In improver, U.S. consumers have grown accustomed to the taste of grain-fed beef, generally preferring the season and overall palatability afforded past the college free energy grain ration[16]. However, changes in consumer demand, coupled with new research on the effect of feed on nutrient content, have a number of producers returning to the pastoral arroyo to beefiness production despite the inherent inefficiencies.

Research spanning iii decades suggests that grass-only diets can significantly alter the fatty acid limerick and ameliorate the overall antioxidant content of beefiness. It is the intent of this review, to synthesize and summarize the information currently available to substantiate an enhanced food merits for grass-fed beef products likewise as to hash out the effects these specific nutrients have on human health.

Review of fatty acid profiles in grass-fed beefiness

Blood-red meat, regardless of feeding regimen, is food dense and regarded equally an important source of essential amino acids, vitamins A, B₆, B₁₂, D, Eastward, and minerals, including iron, zinc and selenium [17,18]. Along with these important nutrients, meat consumers as well ingest a number of fats which are an important source of energy and facilitate the absorption of fat-soluble vitamins including A, D, E and K. According to the ADA, animal fats contribute approximately lx% of the SFA in the American diet, near of which are palmitic acrid (C16:0) and stearic acid (C18:0). Stearic acid has been shown to accept no net impact on serum cholesterol concentrations in humans[17,19]. In addition, 30% of the FA content in conventionally produced beefiness is equanimous of oleic acid (C18:1) [twenty], a monounsaturated FA (MUFA) that elicits a cholesterol-lowering effect among other healthful attributes including a reduced chance of stroke and a pregnant decrease in both systolic and diastolic blood pressure in susceptible populations [21].

Be that every bit information technology may, changes in finishing diets of conventional cattle can alter the lipid profile in such a way as to amend upon this nutritional package. Although at that place are genetic, age related and gender differences among the various meat producing species with respect to lipid profiles and ratios, the outcome of animal diet is quite significant [22]. Regardless of the genetic makeup, gender, age, species or geographic location, direct contrasts between grass and grain rations consistently demonstrate significant differences in the overall fat acid profile and antioxidant content found in the lipid depots and body tissues [22-24].

Tabular array 1 summarizes the saturated fat acrid analysis for a number of studies whose objectives were to contrast the lipid profiles of cattle fed either a grain or grass diets [25-31]. This tabular array is express to those studies utilizing the longissimus dorsi (loin eye), thereby standardizing the contrasts to like cuts within the carcass and limits the comparisons to cattle betwixt 20 and xxx months of age. Unfortunately, non all studies report data in similar units of measure (i.eastward., yard/g of fatty acid), so directly comparisons betwixt studies are not possible.

Table i

Comparing of mean saturated fatty acid limerick (expressed as mg/g of fatty acid or as a % of total lipid) between grass-fed and grain-fed cattle.

	Fat Acid

Author, publication year, brood, treatment	C12:0 lauric	C14:0 myristic	C16:0 palmitic	C18:0 stearic	C20:0 arachidic	Total SFA (units every bit specified)	Total lipid (units equally specified)
Alfaia, et al., 2009, Crossbred steers	grand/100 chiliad lipid
Grass	0.05	1.24*	eighteen.42*	17.54*	0.25*	38.76	9.76* mg/yard muscle
Grain	0.06	one.84*	20.79*	14.96*	0.19*	39.27	13.03* mg/thou muscle
Leheska, et al., 2008, Mixed cattle	g/100 g lipid
Grass	0.05	2.84*	26.9	17.0*	0.thirteen*	48.8*	2.8* % of musculus
Grain	0.07	three.45*	26.3	xiii.2*	0.08*	45.1*	4.4* % of muscle
Garcia et al., 2008, Angus X-bred steers	% of full FA
Grass	na	2.19	23.ane	13.ane*	na	38.iv*	two.86* %International monetary fund
Grain	na	ii.44	22.1	10.viii*	na	35.iii*	3.85* %International monetary fund
Ponnampalam, et al., 2006, Angus steers	mg/100 g muscle tissue
Grass	na	56.9*	508*	272.8	na	900*	two.12%* % of muscle
Grain	na	103.vii*	899*	463.3	na	1568*	3.61%* % of muscle
Nuernberg, et al., 2005, Simmental bulls	% of full intramuscular fat reported as LSM
Grass	0.04	ane.82	22.56*	17.64*	na	43.91	1.51* % of muscle
Grain	0.05	i.96	24.26*	16.80*	na	44.49	ii.61* % of muscle
Descalzo, et al., 2005 Crossbred Steers	% of total FA
Grass	na	two.2	22.0	xix.1	na	42.8	2.7* %IMF
Grain	na	ii.0	25.0	eighteen.2	na	45.5	4.vii* %Imf
Realini, et al., 2004, Hereford steers	% fatty acid within intramuscular fat
Grass	na	1.64*	21.61*	17.74*	na	49.08	1.68* % of musculus
Grain	na	2.17*	24.26*	15.77*	na	47.62	3.18* % of muscle

*Indicates a significant difference (at least P < 0.05) betwixt feeding regimens was reported within each respective study. "na" indicates that the value was not reported in the original written report.

Table 1 reports that grass finished cattle are typically lower in total fat equally compared to grain-fed contemporaries. Interestingly, there is no consistent difference in total SFA content betwixt these two feeding regimens. Those SFA'due south considered to exist more detrimental to serum cholesterol levels, i.east., myristic (C14:0) and palmitic (C16:0), were higher in grain-fed beef as compared to grass-fed contemporaries in threescore% of the studies reviewed. Grass finished meat contains elevated concentrations of stearic acid (C18:0), the just saturated fatty acrid with a internet neutral affect on serum cholesterol. Thus, grass finished beef tends to produce a more than favorable SFA composition although fiddling is known of how grass-finished beef would ultimately impact serum cholesterol levels in hyper-cholesterolemic patients every bit compared to a grain-fed beefiness.

Like SFA intake, dietary cholesterol consumption has also go an important outcome to consumers. Interestingly, beef's cholesterol content is like to other meats (beef 73; pork 79; lamb 85; craven 76; and turkey 83 mg/100 thou) [32], and tin therefore exist used interchangeably with white meats to reduce serum cholesterol levels in hyper-cholesterolemic individuals[11,33]. Studies have shown that breed, nutrition and sex do not affect the cholesterol concentration of bovine skeletal muscle, rather cholesterol content is highly correlated to International monetary fund concentrations[34]. Every bit Imf levels ascension, so goes cholesterol concentrations per gram of tissue [35]. Because pasture raised beef is lower in overall fat [24-27,30], particularly with respect to marbling or IMF [26,36], it would seem to follow that grass-finished beef would be lower in overall cholesterol content although the information is very express. Garcia et al (2008) report 40.3 and 45.8 grams of cholesterol/100 grams of tissue in pastured and grain-fed steers, respectively (P < 0.001) [24].

Interestingly, grain-fed beef consistently produces higher concentrations of MUFAs as compared to grass-fed beef, which include FAs such as oleic acrid (C18:i cis-nine), the chief MUFA in beef. A number of epidemiological studies comparing disease rates in different countries have suggested an changed association betwixt MUFA intake and bloodshed rates to CVD [3,21]. Even and so, grass-fed beef provides a higher concentration of TVA (C18:ane t11), an important MUFA for de novo synthesis of conjugated linoleic acrid (CLA: C18:2 c-9, t-11), a potent anti-carcinogen that is synthesized within the body tissues [37]. Specific information relative to the health benefits of CLA and its biochemistry will be detailed later.

The of import polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs) in conventional beef are linoleic acid (C18:two), alpha-linolenic acrid (C18:three), described as the essential FAs, and the long-chain fatty acids including arachidonic acid (C20:4), eicosapentaenoic acid (C20:5), docosanpetaenoic acid (C22:five) and docosahexaenoic acid (C22:6) [38]. The significance of diet on fatty acrid composition is conspicuously demonstrated when profiles are examined by omega 6 (n-6) and omega iii (n-three) families. Table ii shows no pregnant change to the overall concentration of n-6 FAs between feeding regimens, although grass-fed beef consistently shows a higher concentrations of n-3 FAs equally compared to grain-fed contemporaries, creating a more favorable n-6:n-3 ratio. There are a number of studies that report positive effects of improved n-iii intake on CVD and other health related issues discussed in more than item in the adjacent section.

Table 2

Comparison of hateful polyunsatured fatty acid composition (expressed every bit mg/g of fat acid or equally a % of total lipid) between grass-fed and grain-fed cattle.

	Fatty Acid

Writer, publication twelvemonth, breed, treatment	C18:1 t11 Vaccenic Acid	C18:2 n-6 Linoleic	Total CLA	C18:3 n-iii Linolenic	C20:5n-3 EPA	C22:5n-3 DPA	C22:6n-3 DHA	Total PUFA	Total MUFA	Total n-half dozen	Total north-three	n-6/northward-3 ratio
Alfaia, et al., 2009, Crossbred steers	one thousand/100 g lipid
Grass	1.35	12.55	5.14*	5.53*	two.13*	2.56*	0.20*	28.99*	24.69*	17.97*	10.41*	1.77*
Grain	0.92	11.95	2.65*	0.48*	0.47*	0.91*	0.11*	19.06*	34.99*	17.08	1.97*	8.99*
Leheska, et al., 2008, Mixed cattle	g/100 g lipid
Grass	2.95*	two.01	0.85*	0.71*	0.31	0.24*	na	3.41	42.5*	ii.30	one.07*	2.78*
Grain	0.51*	two.38	0.48*	0.13*	0.19	0.06*	na	2.77	46.2*	2.58	0.19*	13.6*
Garcia, et al., 2008, Angus steers	% of total FAs
Grass	3.22*	3.41	0.72*	ane.thirty*	0.52*	0.lxx*	0.43*	7.95	37.7*	five.00*	2.95*	1.72*
Grain	two.25*	3.93	0.58*	0.74*	0.12*	0.30*	0.14*	9.31	40.8*	eight.05*	0.86*	ten.38*
Ponnampalam, et al., 2006, Angus steers	mg/100 g muscle tissue
Grass	na	108.8*	14.three	32.iv*	24.5*	36.5*	4.ii	na	930*	191.6	97.6*	1.96*
Grain	na	167.4*	16.i	14.9*	thirteen.1*	31.vi*	3.7	na	1729*	253.8	63.3*	iii.57*
Nuernberg, et al., 2005, Simmental bulls	% of total fatty acids
Grass	na	half-dozen.56	0.87*	2.22*	0.94*	ane.32*	0.17*	14.29*	56.09	9.lxxx	iv.70*	2.04*
Grain	na	v.22	0.72*	0.46*	0.08*	0.29*	0.05*	9.07*	55.51	7.73	0.xc*	8.34*
Descalzo, et al., 2005, Crossbred steers	% of full FAs
Grass	iv.2*	five.iv	na	1.four*	tr	0.vi	tr	ten.31*	34.17*	7.4	ii.0	3.72*
Grain	2.eight*	four.vii	na	0.7*	tr	0.4	tr	7.29*	37.83*	6.iii	1.1	5.73*
Realini, et al., 2004, Hereford steers	% fat acid within intramuscular fat
Grass	na	3.29*	0.53*	ane.34*	0.69*	one.04*	0.09	9.96*	forty.96*	na	na	i.44*
Grain	na	2.84*	0.25*	0.35*	0.thirty*	0.56*	0.09	half dozen.02*	46.36*	na	na	three.00*

* Indicates a significant difference (at least P < 0.05) between feeding regimens inside each corresponding study reported. "na" indicates that the value was not reported in the original study. "tr" indicates trace amounts detected.

Review of Omega-3: Omega-vi fatty acrid content in grass-fed beef

In that location are 2 essential fatty acids (EFAs) in human diet: α-linolenic acid (αLA), an omega-3 fatty acid; and linoleic acrid (LA), an omega-6 fatty acid. The human being body cannot synthesize essential fatty acids, yet they are critical to human health; for this reason, EFAs must be obtained from food. Both αLA and LA are polyunsaturated and serve equally precursors of other important compounds. For example, αLA is the precursor for the omega-iii pathway. Also, LA is the parent fatty acrid in the omega-6 pathway. Omega-3 (n-3) and omega-half-dozen (n-6) fatty acids are two separate distinct families, nonetheless they are synthesized by some of the aforementioned enzymes; specifically, delta-5-desaturase and delta-6-desaturase. Excess of 1 family unit of FAs tin can interfere with the metabolism of the other, reducing its incorporation into tissue lipids and altering their overall biological effects [39]. Effigy 1 depicts a schematic of north-6 and due north-3 metabolism and elongation within the body [twoscore].

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc. Object name is 1475-2891-9-10-1.jpg

Linoleic (C18:2n-half-dozen) and α-Linolenic (C18:3n-3) Acrid metabolism and elongation. (Adapted from Simopoulos et al., 1991)

A good for you nutrition should consist of roughly 1 to iv times more than omega-6 fatty acids than omega-3 fatty acids. The typical American nutrition tends to contain xi to 30 times more than omega -6 fatty acids than omega -3, a phenomenon that has been hypothesized equally a meaning factor in the rise rate of inflammatory disorders in the United States[40]. Tabular array 2 shows significant differences in n-6:due north-iii ratios betwixt grass-fed and grain-fed beefiness, with and overall average of ane.53 and vii.65 for grass-fed and grain-fed, respectively, for all studies reported in this review.

The major types of omega-three fatty acids used by the body include: α-linolenic acid (C18:3n-3, αLA), eicosapentaenoic acrid (C20:5n-iii, EPA), docosapentaenoic acrid (C22:5n-3, DPA), and docosahexaenoic acid (C22:6n-3, DHA). Once eaten, the trunk converts αLA to EPA, DPA and DHA, admitting at low efficiency. Studies generally hold that whole body conversion of αLA to DHA is below 5% in humans, the majority of these long-chain FAs are consumed in the diet [41].

The omega-iii fatty acids were get-go discovered in the early 1970'due south when Danish physicians observed that Greenland Eskimos had an exceptionally depression incidence of centre affliction and arthritis despite the fact that they consumed a diet loftier in fat. These early studies established fish equally a rich source of n-3 fat acids. More than recent research has established that EPA and DHA play a crucial role in the prevention of atherosclerosis, heart attack, low and cancer [40,42]. In addition, omega-3 consumption reduced the inflammation caused by rheumatoid arthritis [43,44].

The human brain has a high requirement for DHA; low DHA levels have been linked to depression brain serotonin levels, which are connected to an increased tendency for depression and suicide. Several studies have established a correlation between depression levels of omega -iii fatty acids and low. High consumption of omega-three FAs is typically associated with a lower incidence of depression, a decreased prevalence of age-related retention loss and a lower gamble of developing Alzheimer's disease [45-51].

The National Institutes of Health has published recommended daily intakes of FAs; specific recommendations include 650 mg of EPA and DHA, two.22 g/solar day of αLA and 4.44 g/solar day of LA. However, the Establish of Medicine has recommended DRI (dietary reference intake) for LA (omega-half-dozen) at 12 to 17 grand and αLA (omega-3) at i.1 to i.6 yard for adult women and men, respectively. Although seafood is the major dietary source of due north-3 fatty acids, a recent fatty acid intake survey indicated that carmine meat also serves as a significant source of n-3 fat acids for some populations [52].

Sinclair and co-workers were the first to show that beef consumption increased serum concentrations of a number of n-iii fat acids including, EPA, DPA and DHA in humans [40]. Likewise, there are a number of studies that have been conducted with livestock which report similar findings, i.e., animals that swallow rations loftier in precursor lipids produce a meat product higher in the essential fatty acids [53,54]. For example, cattle fed primarily grass significantly increased the omega-iii content of the meat and also produced a more favorable omega-6 to omega-3 ratio than grain-fed beef [46,55-57].

Table 2 shows the result of ration on polyunsaturated fatty acid limerick from a number of recent studies that contrast grass-based rations to conventional grain feeding regimens [24-28,thirty,31]. Grass-based diets resulted in significantly higher levels of omega-3 within the lipid fraction of the meat, while omega-6 levels were left unchanged. In fact, equally the concentration of grain is increased in the grass-based diet, the concentration of due north-3 FAs decreases in a linear fashion. Grass-finished beefiness consistently produces a higher concentration of northward-3 FAs (without effecting n-6 FA content), resulting in a more favorable n-half dozen:northward-3 ratio.

The amount of total lipid (fat) found in a serving of meat is highly dependent upon the feeding regimen as demonstrated in Tables 1 and 2. Fat will besides vary past cutting, every bit not all locations of the carcass volition deposit fat to the same degree. Genetics also play a role in lipid metabolism creating significant breed effects. Even then, the effect of feeding regimen is a very powerful determinant of fat acid limerick.

Review of conjugated linoleic acid (CLA) and trans vaccenic acrid (TVA) in grass-fed beef

Conjugated linoleic acids make up a group of polyunsaturated FAs establish in meat and milk from ruminant animals and exist as a general mixture of conjugated isomers of LA. Of the many isomers identified, the cis-nine, trans-11 CLA isomer (also referred to equally rumenic acid or RA) accounts for upwardly to lxxx-xc% of the full CLA in ruminant products [58]. Naturally occurring CLAs originate from two sources: bacterial isomerization and/or biohydrogenation of polyunsaturated fat acids (PUFA) in the rumen and the desaturation of trans-fatty acids in the adipose tissue and mammary gland [59,60].

Microbial biohydrogenation of LA and αLA by an anaerobic rumen bacterium Butyrivibrio fibrisolvens is highly dependent on rumen pH [61]. Grain consumption decreases rumen pH, reducing B. fibrisolven action, conversely grass-based diets provide for a more than favorable rumen environment for subsequent bacterial synthesis [62]. Rumen pH may help to explicate the apparent differences in CLA content betwixt grain and grass-finished meat products (see Table 2). De novo synthesis of CLA from xit-C18:one TVA has been documented in rodents, dairy cows and humans. Studies advise a linear increase in CLA synthesis every bit the TVA content of the diet increased in man subjects [63]. The rate of conversion of TVA to CLA has been estimated to range from 5 to 12% in rodents to 19 to 30% in humans[64]. True dietary intake of CLA should therefore consider native 9c11t-C18:2 (actual CLA) every bit well as the 11t-C18:1 (potential CLA) content of foods [65,66]. Figure 2 portrays de novo synthesis pathways of CLA from TVA [37].

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc. Object name is 1475-2891-9-10-2.jpg

De novo synthesis of CLA from 11t-C18:1 vaccenic acid. (Adapted from Bauman et al., 1999)

Natural augmentation of CLA c9t11 and TVA within the lipid fraction of beef products tin be accomplished through diets rich in grass and lush green forages. While precursors can be found in both grains and lush green forages, grass-fed ruminant species have been shown to produce two to 3 times more CLA than ruminants fed in confinement on high grain diets, largely due to a more favorable rumen pH [34,56,57,67] (run into Table ii).

The affect of feeding practices becomes fifty-fifty more axiomatic in light of recent reports from Canada which suggests a shift in the predominate trans C18:1 isomer in grain-fed beef. Dugan et al (2007) reported that the major trans isomer in beef produced from a 73% barley grain diet is 10t-18:ane (2.13% of total lipid) rather than 11t-xviii:1 (TVA) (0.77% of total lipid), a finding that is non particularly favorable because the data that would back up a negative touch of 10t-18:ane on LDL cholesterol and CVD [68,69].

Over the past ii decades numerous studies have shown pregnant health benefits attributable to the deportment of CLA, every bit demonstrated by experimental animate being models, including deportment to reduce carcinogenesis, atherosclerosis, and onset of diabetes [70-72]. Conjugated linoleic acrid has as well been reported to attune body composition past reducing the accumulation of adipose tissue in a diverseness of species including mice, rats, pigs, and now humans [73-76]. These changes in torso limerick occur at ultra high doses of CLA, dosages that can only be attained through constructed supplementation that may likewise produce ill side-effects, such equally gastrointestinal upset, agin changes to glucose/insulin metabolism and compromised liver function [77-81]. A number of first-class reviews on CLA and human health can be plant in the literature [61,82-84].

Optimal dietary intake remains to be established for CLA. Information technology has been hypothesized that 95 mg CLA/day is plenty to show positive furnishings in the reduction of breast cancer in women utilizing epidemiological data linking increased milk consumption with reduced breast cancer[85]. Ha et al. (1989) published a much more conservative estimate stating that 3 k/twenty-four hours CLA is required to promote human health benefits[86]. Ritzenthaler et al. (2001) estimated CLA intakes of 620 mg/day for men and 441 mg/day for women are necessary for cancer prevention[87]. Plainly, all these values represent rough estimates and are mainly based on extrapolated animal data. What is clear is that nosotros as a population do non consume enough CLA in our diets to have a pregnant impact on cancer prevention or suppression. Reports indicate that Americans swallow between 150 to 200 mg/twenty-four hour period, Germans consumer slightly more between 300 to 400 mg/solar day[87], and the Australians seem to be closer to the optimum concentration at 500 to grand mg/twenty-four hour period co-ordinate to Parodi (1994) [88].

Review of pro-Vitamin A/β-carotene in grass-fed meat

Carotenoids are a family of compounds that are synthesized by higher plants as natural plant pigments. Xanthophylls, carotene and lycopene are responsible for xanthous, orangish and red coloring, respectively. Ruminants on loftier fodder rations laissez passer a portion of the ingested carotenoids into the milk and body fatty in a manner that has still to be fully elucidated. Cattle produced under extensive grass-based production systems mostly accept carcass fatty which is more yellowish than their concentrate-fed counterparts caused by carotenoids from the lush light-green forages. Although yellowish carcass fat is negatively regarded in many countries around the globe, information technology is as well associated with a healthier fatty acrid contour and a higher antioxidant content [89].

Constitute species, harvest methods, and season, all have significant impacts on the carotenoid content of forage. In the procedure of making silage, haylage or hay, as much as 80% of the carotenoid content is destroyed [90]. Farther, pregnant seasonal shifts occur in carotenoid content owing to the seasonal nature of plant growth.

Carotenes (mainly β-carotene) are precursors of retinol (Vitamin A), a critical fatty-soluble vitamin that is important for normal vision, bone growth, reproduction, cell division, and cell differentiation [91]. Specifically, information technology is responsible for maintaining the surface lining of the eyes and besides the lining of the respiratory, urinary, and intestinal tracts. The overall integrity of skin and mucous membranes is maintained by vitamin A, creating a barrier to bacterial and viral infection [15,92]. In improver, vitamin A is involved in the regulation of immune function past supporting the production and function of white blood cells [12,13].

The current recommended intake of vitamin A is iii,000 to v,000 IU for men and 2,300 to 4,000 IU for women [93], respectively, which is equivalent to 900 to 1500 μg (micrograms) (Note: DRI as reported by the Establish of Medicine for not-pregnant/non-lactating adult females is 700 μg/day and males is 900 μg/solar day or 2,300 - 3,000 I U (assuming conversion of 3.33 IU/μg). While in that location is no RDA (Required Daily Assart) for β-carotene or other pro-vitamin A carotenoids, the Institute of Medicine suggests consuming 3 mg of β-carotene daily to maintain plasma β-carotene in the range associated with normal part and a lowered run a risk of chronic diseases (NIH: Office of Dietary Supplements).

The furnishings of grass feeding on beta-carotene content of beef was described by Descalzo et al. (2005) who found pasture-fed steers incorporated significantly higher amounts of beta-carotene into muscle tissues every bit compared to grain-fed animals [94]. Concentrations were 0.45 μg/g and 0.06 μg/g for beef from pasture and grain-fed cattle respectively, demonstrating a seven fold increase in β-carotene levels for grass-fed beef over the grain-fed contemporaries. Like data has been reported previously, presumably due to the high β-carotene content of fresh grasses as compared to cereal grains[38,55,95-97]. (see Table 3)

Table three

Comparison of mean β-carotene vitamin content in fresh beef from grass-fed and grain-fed cattle.

	β-carotene

Writer, twelvemonth, animal class	Grass-fed (ug/g tissue)	Grain-fed (ug/g tissue)
Insani et al., 2007, Crossbred steers	0.74*	0.17*
Descalzo et al., 2005 Crossbred steers	0.45*	0.06*
Yang et al., 2002, Crossbred steers	0.xvi*	0.01*

* Indicates a significant difference (at least P < 0.05) between feeding regimens was reported within each respective study.

Review of Vitamin E/α-tocopherol in grass-fed beef

Vitamin Eastward is as well a fatty-soluble vitamin that exists in eight different isoforms with powerful antioxidant activity, the most active being α-tocopherol [98]. Numerous studies have shown that cattle finished on pasture produce higher levels of α-tocopherol in the final meat product than cattle fed high concentrate diets[23,28,94,97,99-101] (see Tabular array 4).

Table iv

Comparison of mean α-tocopherol vitamin content in fresh beef from grass-fed and grain-fed cattle.

	α-tocopherol

Writer, yr, fauna class	Grass-fed (ug/chiliad tissue)	Grain-fed (ug/1000 tissue)
De la Fuente et al., 2009, Mixed cattle	4.07*	0.75*
Descalzo, et al., 2008, Crossbred steers	3.08*	one.50*
Insani et al., 2007, Crossbred steers	2.one*	0.8*
Descalzo, et al., 2005, Crosbred steers	4.6*	2.2*
Realini et al., 2004, Hereford steers	3.91*	2.92*
Yang et al., 2002, Crossbred steers	4.5*	1.viii*

* Indicates a significant divergence (at to the lowest degree P < 0.05) between feeding regimens was reported within each corresponding study.

Antioxidants such as vitamin E protect cells against the effects of free radicals. Free radicals are potentially damaging by-products of metabolism that may contribute to the evolution of chronic diseases such equally cancer and cardiovascular illness.

Preliminary research shows vitamin Due east supplementation may assistance prevent or filibuster coronary heart affliction [102-105]. Vitamin E may as well block the germination of nitrosamines, which are carcinogens formed in the stomach from nitrates consumed in the diet. It may besides protect against the development of cancers by enhancing allowed function [106]. In add-on to the cancer fighting furnishings, there are some observational studies that found lens clarity (a diagnostic tool for cataracts) was ameliorate in patients who regularly used vitamin Eastward [107,108]. The current recommended intake of vitamin E is 22 IU (natural source) or 33 IU (synthetic source) for men and women [93,109], respectively, which is equivalent to 15 milligrams by weight.

The concentration of natural α-tocopherol (vitamin E) found in grain-fed beef ranged between 0.75 to 2.92 μg/g of muscle whereas pasture-fed beef ranges from 2.1 to 7.73 μg/g of tissue depending on the type of fodder made bachelor to the animals (Table 4). Grass finishing increases α-tocopherol levels iii-fold over grain-fed beef and places grass-fed beef well within range of the muscle α-tocopherol levels needed to extend the shelf-life of retail beef (three to 4 μg α-tocopherol/gram tissue) [110]. Vitamin East (α-tocopherol) acts post-mortem to filibuster oxidative deterioration of the meat; a procedure past which myoglobin is converted into brown metmyoglobin, producing a darkened, brown appearance to the meat. In a study where grass-fed and grain-fed beef were directly compared, the bright red colour associated with oxymyoglobin was retained longer in the retail brandish in the grass-fed group, fifty-fifty thought the grass-fed meat contains a college concentration of more oxidizable northward-iii PUFA. The authors concluded that the antioxidants in grass probably caused college tissue levels of vitamin Due east in grazed animals with benefits of lower lipid oxidation and better color retention despite the greater potential for lipid oxidation[111].

Review of antioxidant enzyme content in grass-fed beef

Glutathione (GT), is a relatively new protein identified in foods. It is a tripeptide equanimous of cysteine, glutamic acid and glycine and functions equally an antioxidant primarily equally a component of the enzyme arrangement containing GT oxidase and reductase. Within the prison cell, GT has the capability of quenching free radicals (like hydrogen peroxide), thus protecting the prison cell from oxidized lipids or proteins and foreclose damage to Deoxyribonucleic acid. GT and its associated enzymes are found in virtually all constitute and beast tissue and is readily captivated in the pocket-size intestine[112].

Although our knowledge of GT content in foods is still somewhat limited, dairy products, eggs, apples, beans, and rice contain very trivial GT (< 3.3 mg/100 chiliad). In contrast, fresh vegetables (e.g., asparagus 28.3 mg/100 g) and freshly cooked meats, such as ham and beef (23.three mg/100 m and 17.5 mg/100 g, respectively), are high in GT [113].

Because GT compounds are elevated in lush light-green forages, grass-fed beef is especially high in GT equally compared to grain-fed contemporaries. Descalzo et al. (2007) reported a pregnant increase in GT molar concentrations in grass-fed beefiness [114]. In addition, grass-fed samples were also higher in superoxide dismutase (SOD) and catalase (CAT) activity than beef from grain-fed animals[115]. Superoxide dismutase and catalase are coupled enzymes that work together as powerful antioxidants, SOD scavenges superoxide anions by forming hydrogen peroxide and True cat then decomposes the hydrogen peroxide to H_iiO and O₂. Grass only diets ameliorate the oxidative enzyme concentration in beef, protecting the muscle lipids against oxidation besides every bit providing the beef consumer with an additional source of antioxidant compounds.

Issues related to flavour and palatability of grass-fed beef

Maintaining the more than favorable lipid profile in grass-fed beef requires a high percentage of lush fresh forage or grass in the ration. The college the concentration of fresh green forages, the college the αLA forerunner that will be available for CLA and due north-3 synthesis [53,54]. Fresh pasture forages accept 10 to 12 times more C18:3 than cereal grains [116]. Dried or cured forages, such as hay, will take a slightly lower amount of forerunner for CLA and n-3 synthesis. Shifting diets to cereal grains will cause a significant modify in the FA profile and antioxidant content within thirty days of transition [57].

Because grass-finishing alters the biochemistry of the beef, aroma and flavor will also be afflicted. These attributes are directly linked to the chemic makeup of the concluding product. In a written report comparing the season compounds between cooked grass-fed and grain-fed beefiness, the grass-fed beefiness contained higher concentrations of diterpenoids, derivatives of chlorophyll phone call phyt-one-ene and phyt-two-ene, that changed both the flavor and scent of the cooked product [117]. Others have identified a "greenish" scent from cooked grass-fed meat associated with hexanals derived from oleic and αLA FAs. In dissimilarity to the "dark-green" smell, grain-fed beef was described equally possessing a "soapy" aroma, presumably from the octanals formed from LA that is plant in high concentration in grains [118]. Grass-fed beef consumers can expect a dissimilar flavour and olfactory property to their steaks as they cook on the grill. Likewise, because of the lower lipid content and loftier concentration of PUFAs, cooking time volition be reduced. For an exhaustive look at the upshot of meat compounds on flavor, encounter Calkins and Hodgen (2007) [119].

With respect to palatability, grass-fed beef has historically been less well accustomed in markets where grain-fed products predominant. For instance, in a study where British lambs fed grass and Spanish lambs fed milk and concentrates were assessed by British and Castilian taste panels, both found the British lamb to have a college odor and flavor intensity. However, the British panel preferred the flavor and overall eating quality of the grass-fed lamb, the Castilian panel much preferred the Spanish fed lamb [120]. Likewise, the U.S. is well known for producing corn-fed beef, gustatory modality panels and consumers who are more familiar with the taste of corn-fed beef seem to prefer information technology besides [16]. An individual unremarkably comes to prefer the foods they grew up eating, making consumer sensory panels more of an fine art than science [36]. Trained taste panels, i.e., persons specifically trained to evaluate sensory characteristics in beef, found grass-fed beef less palatable than grain-fed beef in flavor and tenderness [119,121].

Decision

Enquiry spanning three decades supports the statement that grass-fed beefiness (on a chiliad/g fatty ground), has a more desirable SFA lipid profile (more C18:0 cholesterol neutral SFA and less C14:0 & C16:0 cholesterol elevating SFAs) as compared to grain-fed beef. Grass-finished beef is as well higher in full CLA (C18:2) isomers, TVA (C18:1 t11) and north-three FAs on a g/g fatty basis. This results in a amend north-6:northward-iii ratio that is preferred by the nutritional community. Grass-fed beefiness is also higher in precursors for Vitamin A and E and cancer fighting antioxidants such equally GT and SOD activity equally compared to grain-fed contemporaries.

Grass-fed beef tends to be lower in overall fat content, an important consideration for those consumers interested in decreasing overall fat consumption. Because of these differences in FA content, grass-fed beef likewise possesses a distinct grass flavor and unique cooking qualities that should exist considered when making the transition from grain-fed beef. To maximize the favorable lipid profile and to guarantee the elevated antioxidant content, animals should be finished on 100% grass or pasture-based diets.

Grain-fed beef consumers may achieve similar intakes of both north-3 and CLA through consumption of higher fat portions with higher overall palatability scores. A number of clinical studies have shown that today's lean beefiness, regardless of feeding strategy, can be used interchangeably with fish or skinless chicken to reduce serum cholesterol levels in hypercholesterolemic patients.

Abbreviations

c: cis; t: trans; FA: fat acid; SFA: saturated fatty acrid; PUFA: polyunsaturated fat acid; MUFA: monounsaturated fatty acid; CLA: conjugated linoleic acid; TVA: trans-vaccenic acrid; EPA: eicosapentaenoic acid; DPA: docosapentaenoic acid; DHA: docosahexaenoic acid; GT: glutathione; SOD: superoxide dismutase; True cat: catalase.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they accept no competing interests.

Authors' contributions

CAD was responsible for the literature review, completed most of the main writing, created the manuscript and worked through the submission process; AA conducted the literature search, organized the articles according to category, completed some of the primary writing and served every bit editor; SPD conducted a portion of the literature review and served every bit editor for the manuscript; GAN conducted a portion of the literature review and served as editor for the manuscript; SL conducted a portion o the literature review and served as editor for the manuscript. All authors read and canonical the final manuscript.

Acknowledgements

The authors would similar to admit Grace Berryhill for her assistance with the figures, tables and editorial contributions to this manuscript.

References

Griel AE, Kris-Etherton PM. Beyond saturated fat: The importance of the dietary fatty acrid profile on cardiovascular disease. Nutrition Reviews. 2006;64(5):257–62. doi: x.1111/j.1753-4887.2006.tb00208.x. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Kris-Etherton PM, Innis S. Dietary Fatty Acids -- Position of the American Dietetic Association and Dietitians of Canada. American Dietetic Association Position Report. Journal of the American Dietetic Association. 2007;107(9):1599–1611. Ref Blazon: Study. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Hu FB, Stampfer MJ, Manson JE, Rimm E, Colditz GA, Rosner BA, Hennekins CH, Willett WC. Dietary fat intake and the risk of coronary heart disease in women. New England Periodical of Medicine. 1997;337:1491–9. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199711203372102. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Posner BM, Cobb JL, Belanger AJ, Cupples LA, D'Agostino RB, Stokes J. Dietary lipid predictors of coronary heart affliction in men. The Framingham Study. Archives of Internal Medicine. 1991;151:1181–vii. doi: x.1001/archinte.151.half-dozen.1181. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Mensink RP, Katan MB. Effect of dietary fat acids on serum lipids and lipoproteins. Arteriosclerosis Thrombosis Vascular Biological science. 1992;12:911–9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Keys A. Coronary center disease in 7 countries. Apportionment. 1970;41(ane):211. [Google Scholar]
Mensink RP, Zock PL, Kester Advert, Katan MB. Effects of dietary fatty acids and carbohydrates on the ratio of serum full HDL cholesterol and on serum lipids and apolipoproteins: A meta-analysis of 60 controlled trials. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition. 2003;77:1146–55. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Putnam J, Allshouse J, Scott-Kantor L. U.S. per capita food supply trends: More than calories, refined carbohydrates, and fats. Food Review. 2002;25(3):two–15. [Google Scholar]
Kris-Etherton PMYS. Private fatty acid effects on plasma lipids and lipoproteins. Human studies. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition. 1997;65(suppl.5):1628S–44S. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Higgs JD. The changing nature of cherry-red meat: twenty years improving nutritional quality. Trends in Food Science and Engineering. 2000;11:85–95. doi: ten.1016/S0924-2244(00)00055-8. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
O'Dea K, Traianedes K, Chisholm Chiliad, Leyden H, Sinclair AJ. Cholesterol-lowering effect of a low-fat nutrition containing lean beef is reversed by the addition of beef fat. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition. 1990;52:491–4. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Beauchesne-Rondeau Due east, Gascon A, Bergeron J, Jacques H. Plasma lipids and lipoproteins in hypercholesterolemic men fed a lipid-lowering diet containing lean beef, lean fish, or poultry. American Periodical of Clinical Nutrition. 2003;77(iii):587–93. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Melanson K, Gootman J, Myrdal A, Kline Chiliad, Rippe JM. Weight loss and total lipid profile changes in overweight women consuming beef or craven as the master protein source. Diet. 2003;19:409–14. doi: 10.1016/S0899-9007(02)01080-eight. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Denke MA. Role of beef and beef tallow, an enriched source of stearic acid, in a cholesterol-lowering diet. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition. 1994;60:1044S–9S. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Smith DR, Woods R, Tseng South, Smith SB. Increased beef consumption increases lipoprotein A-I only not serum cholesterol of mildly hypercholesterolemic men with different levels of habitual beef intake. Experimental Biological Medicine. 2002;227(4):266–75. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Wood JD, Richardson RI, Nute GR, Fisher AV, Campo MM, Kasapidou E, Sheard PR, Enser M. Effects of fatty acids on meat quality: review. Meat Scientific discipline. 2003;66:21–32. doi: ten.1016/S0309-1740(03)00022-6. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Williamson CS, Foster RK, Stanner SA, Buttriss JL. Red meat in the diet. British Nutrition Foundation. Diet Bulletin. 2005;thirty:323–335. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-3010.2005.00525.x. Ref Type: Report. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Biesalski HK. Meat every bit a component of a healthy nutrition - are there whatsoever risks or benefits if meat is avoided? Meat Science. 2005;70(iii):509–24. doi: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2004.07.017. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Yu S, Derr J, Etherton TD, Kris-Etherton PM. Plasma cholesterol-predictive equations demonstrate that stearic acid is neutral and monosaturated fat acids are hypocholesterolemic. American Journal of Clinical Diet. 1995;61:1129–39. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Whetsell MS, Rayburn EB, Lozier JD. Man Wellness Effects of Fatty Acids in Beef. Fact Sheet: West Virgina University & U.Southward.D.A. Agriculture Enquiry Service. Extension Service West Virginia Academy; 2003. Ref Blazon: Electronic Citation. [Google Scholar]
Kris-Etherton PM. Monounsaturated fatty acids and risk of cardiovascular disease. Apportionment. 1999;100:1253. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
DeSmet S, Raes K, Demeyer D. Meat fatty acrid limerick as affected past fatness and genetic factors: a review. Creature Research. 2004;53:81–98. doi: 10.1051/animres:2004003. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
De la Fuente J, Diaz MT, Alvarez I, Oliver MA, Font i Furnols M, Sanudo C, Campo MM, Montossi F, Nute GR, Caneque 5. Fatty acid and vitamin E limerick of intramuscular fat in cattle reared in unlike production systems. Meat Science. 2009;82:331–vii. doi: ten.1016/j.meatsci.2009.02.002. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Garcia PT, Pensel NA, Sancho AM, Latimori NJ, Kloster AM, Amigone MA, Casal JJ. Beef lipids in relation to animal breed and nutrition in Argentina. Meat Science. 2008;79:500–viii. doi: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2007.10.019. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Alfaia CPM, Alves SP, Martins SIV, Costa ASH, Fontes CMGA, Lemos JPC, Bessa RJB, Prates JAM. Event of feeding system on intramuscular fatty acids and conjugated linoleic acid isomers of beef cattle, with accent on their nutritional value and discriminatory ability. Nutrient Chemistry. 2009;114:939–46. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2008.10.041. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Leheska JM, Thompson LD, Howe JC, Hentges E, Boyce J, Brooks JC, Shriver B, Hoover Fifty, Miller MF. Furnishings of conventional and grass-feeding systems on the nutrient composition of beef. Periodical Animal Science. 2008;86:3575–85. doi: 10.2527/jas.2007-0565. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Nuernberg K, Dannenberger D, Nuernberg G, Ender Chiliad, Voigt J, Scollan ND, Forest JD, Nute GR, Richardson RI. Effect of a grass-based and a concentrate feeding system on meat quality characteristics and fatty acid limerick of longissimus muscle in different cattle breeds. Livestock Production Science. 2005;94:137–47. doi: 10.1016/j.livprodsci.2004.eleven.036. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Realini CE, Duckett SK, Brito GW, Rizza Physician, De Mattos D. Upshot of pasture vs. concentrate feeding with or without antioxidants on carcass characteristics, fatty acid composition, and quality of Uruguayan beef. Meat Scientific discipline. 2004;66:567–77. doi: 10.1016/S0309-1740(03)00160-eight. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Warren HE, Enser K, Richardson I, Wood JD, Scollan ND. Effect of breed and diet on total lipid and selected shelf-life parameters in beefiness muscle. Proceedings of British Social club of beast science. 2003. p. 23.
Ponnampalam EN, Mann NJ, Sinclair AJ. Effect of feeding systems on omega-three fat acids, conjugated linoleic acid and trans fatty acids in Australian beef cuts, potential impact on human health. Asia Pacific Journal of Clinical Nutrition. 2006;15(1):21–9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Descalzo A, Insani EM, Biolatto A, Sancho AM, Garcia PT, Pensel NA. Influence of pasture or grain-based diets supplemented with vitamin E on antioxidant/oxidative balance of Argentine beefiness. Meat Science. 2005;lxx:35–44. doi: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2004.11.018. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Wheeler TL, Davis GW, Stoecker BJ, Harmon CJ. Cholesterol concentrations of longissimus muscle, subcutaneous fat and serum of two beef cattle breed types. Journal of Beast Scientific discipline. 1987;65:1531–7. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Smith DR, Wood R, Tseng S, Smith SB. Increased beef consumption increases apolipoprotein A-i merely not serum cholesterol of mildly hypercholesterolemic men with unlike levels of habitual beef intake. Experimental Biological Medicine. 2002;227(4):266–75. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Dominion DC, Broughton KS, Shellito SM, Maiorano G. Comparison of muscle fatty acid profiles and cholesterol concentrations of bison, cattle, elk and chicken. Journal Animal Science. 2002;lxxx:1202–eleven. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Alfaia CPM, Castro MLF, Martins SIV, Portugal APV, Alves SPA, Fontes CMGA. Influence of slaughter season and musculus type on faty acid composition, conjugated linoleic acid isomeric distribution and nutritional quality of intramuscular fatty in Arouquesa-PDO veal. Meat Scientific discipline. 2007;76:787–95. doi: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2007.02.023. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Sitz BM, Calkins CR, Feuz DM, Umberger WJ, Eskridge KM. Consumer sensory acceptance and value of domestic, Canadian, and Australian grass-fed beef steaks. Journal of Fauna Science. 2005;83:2863–eight. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Bauman DE, Lock AL. Advanced Dairy Chemistry. 3. 2. Springer, New York; 2006. Conjugated linoleic acid: biosynthesis and nutritional significance. Play a trick on and McSweeney; pp. 93–136. Ref Type: Serial (Book, Monograph) [Google Scholar]
Enser Yard, Hallett KG, Hewett B, Fursey GAJ, Forest JD, Harrington G. Fatty acid content and limerick of United kingdom beef and lamb muscle in relation to production system and implications for human nutrition. Meat Scientific discipline. 1998;49(three):329–41. doi: 10.1016/S0309-1740(97)00144-7. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Ruxton CHS, Reed SC, Simpson JA, Millington KJ. The health benefits of omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids: a review of the show. The Journal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics. 2004;17:449–59. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-277X.2004.00552.x. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Simopoulos A. Omega-3 fat acids in wellness and disease and in growth and development. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition. 1991;54:438–63. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Thomas BJ. Efficiency of conversion of blastoff-linolenic acid to long chain n-three fatty acids in man. Electric current Stance in Clincal Nutrition and Metabolic Care. 2002;5(2):127–32. doi: 10.1097/00075197-200203000-00002. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Connor We. Importance of n-iii fat acids in health and disease. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition. 2000;71:171S–5S. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Kremer JM, Lawrence DA, Jubiz W, Galli C, Simopoulos AP. Dietary Omega-3 and Omega-6 fat acids: biological furnishings and nutritional essentiality. New York: Plenum Press; 1989. Different doses of fish -oil fatty acrid ingestion in active rheumatoid arthritis: a prospective report of clinical and immunological parameters. [Google Scholar]
DiGiacomo RA, Kremer JM, Shah DM. Fish-oil dietary supplementation in patients with Raynaud'due south Miracle: A double-blind, controlled, prospective study. The American Journal of Medicine. 1989;86:158–64. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(89)90261-1. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Kalmijn Due south. Dietary fat intake and the risk of incident dementia in the Rotterdam Study. Register of Neurology. 1997;42(5):776–82. doi: 10.1002/ana.410420514. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Yehuda South, Rabinovtz S, Carasso RL, Mostofsky DI. Essential fatty acids preparation (SR-three) improves Alzheimer's patient's quality of life. International Journal of Neuroscience. 1996;87(three-4):141–9. doi: 10.3109/00207459609070833. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Hibbeln JR. Fish oil consumption and major low. The Lancet. 1998;351:1213. doi: ten.1016/S0140-6736(05)79168-6. (April 18 1998) [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Hibbeln JR, Salem N. Dietary polyunsaturated fatty acids and low: when cholesterol does not satisfy. American Periodical of Clinical Nutrition. 1995;62:ane–nine. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Stoll AL. Omega iii fatty acids in bipolar disorder. Archives of General Psychiatry. 1999;56 407-12-415-xvi. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Calabrese JR, Rapport DJ, Shleton MD. Fish oils and bipolar disorder. Archives of General Psychiatry. 1999;56:413–4. doi: ten.1001/archpsyc.56.five.413. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Laugharne JDE. Fatty acids and schizophrenia. Lipids. 1996;31:S163–S165. doi: 10.1007/BF02637070. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Sinclair AJ, Johnson L, O'Dea G, Holman RT. Diets rich in lean beef increase arachidonic acid and long-concatenation omega 3 polyunsaturated fatty acrid levels in plasma phospholipids. Lipids. 1994;29(five):337–43. doi: 10.1007/BF02537187. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Raes G, DeSmet South, Demeyer D. Outcome of dietary fat acids on incorporation of long chain polyunsaturated fatty acids and conjugated linoleic acid in lamb, beef and pork meat: a review. Fauna Feed Science and Applied science. 2004;113:199–221. doi: x.1016/j.anifeedsci.2003.09.001. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Marmer WN, Maxwell RJ, Williams JE. Effects of dietary regimen and tissue site on bovine fatty acrid profiles. Journal Creature Scientific discipline. 1984;59:109–21. [Google Scholar]
Forest JD, Enser M. Factors influencing fat acids in meat and the role of antioxidants in improving meat quality. British Periodical of Nutrition. 1997;78:S49–S60. doi: x.1079/BJN19970134. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
French P, Stanton C, Lawless F, O'Riordan EG, Monahan FJ, Caffery PJ, Moloney AP. Fatty acrid composition, including conjugated linoleic acid of intramuscular fat from steers offered grazed grass, grass silage or concentrate-based diets. Journal Beast Scientific discipline. 2000;78:2849–55. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Duckett SK, Wagner DG, Yates LD, Dolezal HG, May SG. Effects of time on feed on beefiness nutrient composition. Journal Fauna Science. 1993;71:2079–88. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Nuernberg K, Nuernberg Grand, Ender K, Lorenz S, Winkler M, Rickert R, Steinhart H. Omega-3 fatty acids and conjugated linoleic acids of longissimus muscle in beef cattle. European Journal of Lipid Science Technology. 2002;104:463–71. doi: 10.1002/1438-9312(200208)104:8<463::Aid-EJLT463>3.0.CO;2-U. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Griinari JM, Corl BA, Lacy SH, Chouinard PY, Nurmela KV, Bauman DE. Conjugated linoleic acid is synthesized endogenoulsy in lactating dairy cows by delta-9 desaturase. Journal of Nutrition. 2000;130:2285–91. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Sehat North, Rickert RR, Mossoba MM, Dramer JKG, Yurawecz MP, Roach JAG, Adlof RO, Morehouse KM, Fritsche J, Eulitz KD, Steinhart H, Ku K. Improved separation of conjugated fatty acid methyl esters by argent ion-high-performance liquid chromatography. Lipids. 1999;34:407–thirteen. doi: 10.1007/s11745-999-0379-3. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Pariza MW, Park Y, Cook ME. Mechanisms of action of conjugated linoleic acid: evidence and speculation. Proceedings for the Club of Experimental Biology and Medicine. 2000;32:853–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Bessa RJB, Santos-Silva J, Ribeiro JMR, Portugal AV. Reticulo-rumen biohydrogenation and the enrichment of ruminant edible products with linoleic acid conjugated isomers. Livestock Product Science. 2000;63:201–11. doi: ten.1016/S0301-6226(99)00117-7. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Turpeinen AM, Mutanen 1000, Aro ASI, Basu SPD, Griinar JM. Bioconversion of vaccenic acrid to conjugated linoleic acid in humans. American Periodical of Clinical Nutrition. 2002;76:504–x. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Turpeinen AM, Mautanen M, Aro A, Salminen I, Basu Southward, Palmquist DL. Bioconversion of vaccenic acid to conjugated linoleic acid in humans. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition. 2002;76:504–10. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Turpeinen AM, Mautanen M, Aro A, Salminen I, Basu Due south, Palmquist DL. Bioconversion of vaccenic acrid to conjugated linoleic acid in humans. American Periodical of Clinical Nutrition. 2002;76:504–x. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Adlof RO, Duval South, Emken EA. Biosynthesis of conjugated linoleic acrid in humans. Lipids. 2000;35:131–5. doi: x.1007/BF02664761. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Mandell IB, Gullett JG, Buchanan-Smith JG, Campbell CP. Effects of nutrition and slaughter endpoint on carcass limerick and beef quality in Charolais cross steers fed alfalfa silage and (or) high concentrate diets. Canadian Journal of Animal Scientific discipline. 1997;77:403–14. [Google Scholar]
Dugan MER, Rollan DC, Aalhus JL, Aldai N, Kramer JKG. Subcutaneous fat composition of youthful and mature Canadian beef: emphasis on private conjugated linoleic acid and trans-18:1 isomers. Canadian Periodical of Animal Scientific discipline. 2008;88:591–9. [Google Scholar]
Hodgson JM, Wahlqvist ML, Boxall JA, Balazs ND. Platelet trans fatty acids in relation to angiographically assessed coronary artery affliction. Atherosclerosis. 1996;120:147–54. doi: x.1016/0021-9150(95)05696-3. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
IP C, Scimeca JA, Thompson HJ. Conjugated linoleic acrid. Cancer Supplement. 1994;74(3):1050–iv. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Kritchevsky D, Tepper SA, Wright S, Tso P, Czarnecki SK. Influence of conjugated linoleic acid (CLA) on establishment and progression of atherosclerosis in rabbits. Periodical American Drove of Nutrition. 2000;nineteen(iv):472S–7S. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Steinhart H, Rickert R, Winkler G. Identification and analysis of conjugated linoleic acid isomers (CLA) European Journal of Medicine. 1996;20(8):370–2. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Dugan MER, Aalhus JL, Jeremiah LE, Kramer JKG, Schaefer AL. The effects of feeding conjugated linoleic acrid on subsequent port quality. Canadian Journal of Animal Science. 1999;79:45–51. [Google Scholar]
Park Y, Albright KJ, Liu W, Storkson JM, Cook ME, Pariza MW. Result of conjugated linoleic acid on body composition in mice. Lipids. 1997;32:853–8. doi: ten.1007/s11745-997-0109-10. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Sisk M, Hausman D, Martin R, Azain Chiliad. Dietary conjugated linoleic acrid reduces adiposity in lean but not obese Zucker rats. Journal of Diet. 2001;131:1668–74. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Smedman A, Vessby B. Conjugated linoleic acrid supplementation in humans - Metabolic furnishings. Journal of Diet. 2001;36:773–81. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Tsuboyama-Kasaoka N, Takahashi M, Tanemura K, Kim HJ, Tange T, Okuyama H, Kasai Yard, Ikemoto SS, Ezaki O. Conjugated linoleic acid supplementation reduces adipose tissue by apoptosis and develops lipodystrophy in mice. Diabetes. 2000;49:1534–42. doi: 10.2337/diabetes.49.9.1534. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Clement L, Poirier H, Niot I, Bocher V, Guerre-Millo M, Krief B, Staels B, Besnard P. Dietary trans-10, cis-12 conjugated linoleic acid induces hyperinsulemia and fatty liver in the mouse. Periodical of Lipid Research. 2002;43:1400–9. doi: 10.1194/jlr.M20008-JLR200. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Roche HM, Noone E, Sewter C, McBennett S, Barbarous D, Gibney MJ, O'Rahilly South, Vidal-Plug AJ. Isomer-dependent metabolic effects of conjugated linoleic acid: insights from molecular markers sterol regulatory element-binding poly peptide 1c and LXR blastoff. Diabetes. 2002;51:2037–44. doi: 10.2337/diabetes.51.7.2037. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Riserus U, Arner P, Brismar One thousand, Vessby B. Treatment with dietary trans ten cis 12 conjugated linoleic acid causes isomer specific insulin resistance in obese men with the metabolic syndrome. Diabetes Care. 2002;25:1516–21. doi: 10.2337/diacare.25.9.1516. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Delany JP, Blohm F, Truett AA, Scimeca JA, West DB. Conjugated linoleic acrid apace reduces body fat content in mice without affecting free energy intake. American Journal of Physiology. 1999;276(4 pt 2):R1172–R1179. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Kelley DS, Simon VA, Taylor PC, Rudolph IL, Benito P. Dietary supplementation with conjugated linoleic acid increased its concentration in human peripheral blood mononuclear cells, but did non alter their function. Lipids. 2001;36:669–74. doi: ten.1007/s11745-001-0771-z. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Whigham LD, Melt ME, Atkinson RL. Conjugated linoleic acid: Implications for human health. Pharmacological Research. 2000;42(6):503–ten. doi: 10.1006/phrs.2000.0735. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Schmid A, Collomb K, Sieber R, Bee Thou. Conjugated linoleic acrid in meat and meat products. A review Meat Science. 2006;73:29–41. doi: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2005.10.010. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Knekt P, Jarvinen R, Seppanen R, Pukkala E, Aromaa A. Intake of dairy products and the gamble of chest cancer. British Periodical of Cancer. 1996;73:687–91. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Ha YL, Grimm NK, Pariza MW. Newly recognized anticarcinogenic fatty acids: identification and quantification in natural and candy cheese. Journal of Agricultural and Nutrient Chemistry. 1989;37:75–81. doi: 10.1021/jf00085a018. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Ritzenthaler KL, McGuire MK, Falen R, Shultz TD, Dasgupta N, McGuire MA. Estimation of conjugated linoleic acid intake by written dietary cess methodologies underestimates actual intake evaluated past food duplicate methodology. Periodical of Nutrition. 2001;131:1548–54. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Parodi Pow. Conjugated linoleic acid: an anticarcinogenic fatty acid present in milk fat (review) Australian Journal of Dairy Technology. 1994;49(2):93–7. [Google Scholar]
Dunne PG, Monahan FJ, O'Mara FP, Moloney AP. Colour of bovine subcutaneous adipose tissue: A review of contributory factors, associations with carcass and meat quality and its potential utility in authentication of dietary history. Meat Science. 2009;81(ane):28–45. doi: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2008.06.013. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Chauveau-Duriot B, Thomas D, Portelli J, Doreau One thousand. Carotenoids content in forages: variation during conservation. Renc Rech Ruminants. 2005;12:117. [Google Scholar]
Scott LW, Dunn JK, Pownell HJ, Brauchi DJ, McMann MC, Herd JA, Harris KB, Savell JW, Cantankerous HR, Gotto AM Jr. Effects of beefiness and chicken consumption on plasma lipid levels in hypercholesterolemic men. Athenaeum of Internal Medicine. 1994;154(eleven):1261–seven. doi: 10.1001/archinte.154.11.1261. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Hunninghake DB, Maki KC, Kwiterovick PO Jr, Davidson MH, Dicklin MR, Kafonek SD. Incorporation of lean red meat National Cholesterol Educational activity Program Step I diet: a long-term, randomized clinical trial in costless-living persons with hypercholesterolemic. Journal of American Colleges of Nutrition. 2000;nineteen(iii):351–60. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
National Institute of Wellness Clinical Nutrition Eye. Facts about dietary supplements: Vitamin A and Carotenoids. 2002. Ref Type: Pamphlet.
Descalzo AM, Insani EM, Biolatto A, Sancho AM, Garcia PT, Pensel NA, Josifovich JA. Influence of pasture or grain-based diets supplemented with vitamin Due east on antioxidant/oxidative residual of Argentine beef. Journal of Meat Science. 2005;lxx:35–44. doi: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2004.11.018. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Simonne AH, Green NR, Bransby DI. Consumer acceptability and beta-carotene content of beef as related to cattle finishing diets. Journal of Food Scientific discipline. 1996;61:1254–6. doi: x.1111/j.1365-2621.1996.tb10973.x. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Duckett SK, Pratt SL, Pavan E. Corn oil or corn grain supplementation to stters grazing endophyte-free tall fescue. II. Effects on subcutaneous fatty acid content and lipogenic cistron expression. Periodical of Animal Scientific discipline. 2009;87:1120–8. doi: 10.2527/jas.2008-1420. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Yang A, Brewster MJ, Lanari MC, Tume RK. Upshot of vitamin East supplementation on alpha-tocopherol and beta-carotene concentrations in tissues from pasture and grain-fed cattle. Meat Science. 2002;60(1):35–40. doi: ten.1016/S0309-1740(01)00102-iv. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Pryor WA. Vitamin E and Carotenoid Abstracts- 1994 Studies of Lipid-Soluble Antioxidants. Vitamin E Inquiry and Information Services. 1996.
Arnold RN, Scheller North, Arp KK, Williams SC, Beuge DR, Schaefer DM. Event of long or brusk-term feeding of alfa-tocopherol acetate to Holstein and crossbred beefiness steers on operation, carcass characteristics, and beef color stability. Journal Animal Science. 1992;70:3055–65. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Descalzo AM, Sancho AM. A review of natural antioxidants and their effects on oxidative status, odor and quality of fresh beef in Argentina. Meat Scientific discipline. 2008;79:423–36. doi: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2007.12.006. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Insani EM, Eyherabide A, Grigioni G, Sancho AM, Pensel NA, Descalzo AM. Oxidative stability and its relationship with natural antioxidants during refrigerated retail brandish of beef produced in Argentina. Meat Science. 2008;79:444–52. doi: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2007.ten.017. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Lonn EM, Yusuf Southward. Is in that location a role for antioxidant vitamins in the prevention of cardiovascular diseases? An update on epidemiological and clinical trials information. Cancer Journal of Cardiology. 1997;13:957–65. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Jialal I, Fuller CJ. Result of vitamin E, vitamin C and beta-carotene on LDL oxidation and atherosclerosis. Canadian Journal of Cardiology. 1995;xi(supplemental Thou):97G–103G. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Stampfer MJ, Hennekens CH, Manson JE, Colditz GA, Rosner B, Willett WC. Vitamin East consumption and the risk of coronary disease in women. New England Periodical of Medicine. 1993;328(1444):1449. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Knekt P, Reunanen A, Jarvinen R, Seppanen R, Heliovaara Thousand, Aromaa A. Antioxidant vitamin intake and coronary bloodshed in a longitudinal population study. American Journal of Epidemiology. 1994;139:1180–9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Weitberg AB, Corvese D. Effects of vitamin E and beta-carotene on Deoxyribonucleic acid strand breakage induced by tobacco-specific nitrosamines and stimulated human phagocytes. Journal of Experimental Cancer Research. 1997;sixteen:11–four. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Leske MC, Chylack LT Jr, He Q, Wu SY, Schoenfeld Due east, Friend J, Wolfe J. Antioxidant vitamins and nuclear opacities: The longitudinal study of cataract. Ophthalmology. 1998;105:831–6. doi: ten.1016/S0161-6420(98)95021-7. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Teikari JM, Virtamo J, Rautalahi Grand, Palmgren J, Liestro K, Heinonen OP. Long-term supplementation with blastoff-tocopherol and beta-carotene and age-related cataract. Acta Ophthalmologica Scandinavica. 1997;75:634–40. doi: ten.1111/j.1600-0420.1997.tb00620.ten. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Dietary guidelines Advisory Committee, Agricultural Research Service United states of america Department of Agriculture USDA. Written report of the dietary guidelines advisory committee on the dietary guidelines for Americans. Dietary guidelines Informational Committee. 2000. Ref Type: Hearing.
McClure EK, Belk KE, Scanga JA, Smith GC. Decision of appropriate Vitamin Due east supplementation levels and assistants times to ensure acceptable muscle tissue blastoff-tocopherol concentration in cattle destined for the Nolan Ryan tender-anile beef plan. Animal Sciences Enquiry Report. The Section of Animal Sciences, Colorado Land University; 2002. Ref Type: Study. [Google Scholar]
Yang A, Lanari MC, Brewster MJ, Tume RK. Lipid stability and meat colour of beef from pasture and grain-fed cattle with or without vitamin E supplement. Meat Science. 2002;60:41–50. doi: 10.1016/S0309-1740(01)00103-6. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Valencia E, Marin A, Hardy G. Glutathione - Nutritional and Pharmacological Viewpoints: Part Two. Nutraceuticals. 2001;17:485–vi. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Valencia East, Marin A, Hardy G. Glutathione - Nutritional and Pharmacologic Viewpoints: Function Four. Nutraceuticals. 2001;17:783–4. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Descalzo AM, Rossetti Fifty, Grigioni G, Irurueta Chiliad, Sancho AM, Carrete J, Pensel NA. Antioxidant status and odour profile in fresh beef from pasture or grain-fed cattle. Meat Science. 2007;75:299–307. doi: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2006.07.015. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Gatellier P, Mercier Y, Renerre M. Consequence of diet finishing mode (pasture or mixed diet) on antioxidant condition of Charolais bovine meat. Meat Science. 2004;67:385–94. doi: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2003.11.009. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
French P, O'Riordan EG, Monahan FJ, Caffery PJ, Moloney AP. Fat acid composition of intra-muscular tricylglycerols of steers fed fall grass and concentrates. Livestock Production Science. 2003;81:307–17. doi: 10.1016/S0301-6226(02)00253-ane. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Elmore JS, Warren HE, Mottram DS, Scollan ND, Enser K, Richardson RI. A comparing of the aroma volatiles and fatty acid compositions of grilled beef muscle from Aberdeen Angus and Holstein-Friesian steers fed deits based on silage or concentrates. Meat Science. 2006;68:27–33. doi: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2004.01.010. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Lorenz Southward, Buettner A, Ender K, Nuernberg Chiliad, Papstein HJ, Schieberle P. Influence of keeping organization on the fatty acid composition in the longissimus musculus of bulls and odorants formed after pressure-cooking. European Food Research and Technology. 2002;214:112–8. doi: 10.1007/s00217-001-0427-4. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Calkins CR, Hodgen JM. A fresh look at meat season. Meat Science. 2007;77:63–80. doi: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2007.04.016. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Sanudo C, Enser ME, Campo MM, Nute GR, Maria G, Sierra I, Wood JD. Fat acid composition and sensory characteristics of lamb carcasses from U.k. and Espana. Meat Science. 2000;54:339–46. doi: ten.1016/S0309-1740(99)00108-4. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Killinger KM, Calkins CR, Umberger WJ, Feuz DM, Eskridge KM. A comparison of consumer sensory credence and value of domestic beef steaks and steaks form a branded, Argentine beefiness program. Periodical Animal Scientific discipline. 2004;82:3302–vii. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Diet Periodical are provided here courtesy of BioMed Central

stringernalkents.blogspot.com

Source: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2846864/